0 10 min 7 mths


Why is the media shifting gears on the Covid hysteria? Is it because the “pandemic” is really over? Or is it an important part of the gaslighting process?

In the last few days, even weeks, the media attitude towards the Covid “pandemic” has changed significantly.

There have been numerous examples of what might be termed “dissent” if the media were not so tightly controlled. However, since they are strictly controlled, we have to speak of an apparent change in message.

became famous Dr. Steve James, an anesthesiologist who confronted the British Health Secretary, Sajid Javid, about the weakness of the scientific basis for compulsory vaccination. This was broadcast on Sky News by the way:

A few days ago, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the director of the CDC, featured on Good Morning Americato talk about the “omicron” wave, and finally pointed out that most “omicron deaths” have multiple comorbidities.

In another interview mit „Fox News“ said dr Walenksy that the CDC will release data on how many people an Covid have died and how many With have died from Covid.

This raises a number of important questions.

  1. Why is the director of the CDC (apparently) agreeing to these arguments from the Covid skeptics after she for two years acted like they didn’t exist?
  2. Why is Sky News broadcasting and then tweeting a video clip of a doctor challenging the health minister?
  3. Why does the Guardian bring headlines like „End mass jabs and live with Covid, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce“ [Beendet die Massenimpfungen und lebt mit Covid, sagt der ehemalige Leiter der Impfstoff-Taskforce, Anm. d. Übersetzers] and quotes medical staff saying that we “Have to treat Covid like the flu„?
  4. Why are new studies being promoted claiming that T cells from common colds “can protect you from Covid„?

The message and the deceleration of the narrative cannot be overlooked. There is a new thread being woven into the story: ‘Living with Covid’.

This has been a popular buzzword in the western press for over a month.

December 1st headlined “Forbes”:

Why endemic Covid-19 will be cause for celebration

The article claims, among other things, “endemic Covid-19 [sei] no worse than the seasonal flu”. This claim was repeated ad nauseam in various media.

We’ve already mentioned the January 8 Guardian article, but there’s also a previous December 5 article with the title “From pandemic to endemic: How we could return to normal”.

CNBC brought it within two weeks three almost identical articles on this topic:

On New Year’s Day appeared on “Vox” an article with the title:

Despite Omicron, Covid-19 will become endemic. That’s how it works.

Bloomberg reports that Omicron “the end of the acute phase of the pandemic” signal.

Just yesterday the New York Post headlined: “COVID will become endemic this year, former Biden task force chief predicts”, and USA Today asked: “The pandemic is changing. Will Omicron bring a ‘new normal’ to COVID-19?”

And Channel 4 said today that ‘Covid in 2022’ means “learning to live with the virus”.

The message isn’t just media-based either. ‘Living With Covid’ will reportedly be the UK Government’s strategy for 2022, and an official publication on the subject will be “in the next weeks” expected.

The term “living with the virus‘ will be added to the Covid vocabulary alongside the terms ‘flattening the curve’ and ‘the new normal’. But what does that actually mean?

What is really meant when it says “living with Covid”?

First of all, we shouldn’t make the mistake of trusting a government, the media or an “expert” just because they start telling 20% ​​of the truth.

They’re liars, they have an agenda, that’s always the case – you should always be aware of that, even if – or especially if – they suddenly tell you what you want to hear.

They haven’t seen the light, they don’t correct their mistakes, they don’t finally come to their senses, and they don’t switch sides.

There are no Damascus conversions. There is no wave of guilty conscience sweeping through the elite.

You have an agenda. You always have an agenda.

You should also banish any notions of a “return to normal” from your mind. That won’t happen.

How do we know? Because they said so.

Half of the articles dealing with the topic of ‘living with Covid’ go into detail that things are not really going to change. Take this one from yesterday im „Guardian“ appeared:

“Living with Covid” does not have to mean throwing all protective measures overboard

It lays out that Covid could soon become endemic, that mass testing of asymptomatic people could be counterproductive and should possibly be stopped – but that means no about-face on masks or vaccines and opens the door to a new “variant” to use in the future to initiate further lockdowns:

“Living with Covid” does not have to mean undoing every protective measure. If better ventilation and face masks reduce the impact of respiratory illnesses in winter, that’s a positive, even if the NHS is no longer in imminent danger of being overwhelmed. We must also continue to keep an eye on the threat of new variants that could still cause major setbacks. There is no guarantee that another variant more infectious and virulent than Omicron will not emerge in the future. The scientists say supporting the global immunization effort will be crucial to securing the path to normalcy.

Masks, working from home, and social distancing in busy environments could “remain within reach,” according to one of the CNBC articles referenced above. And “Covid boosters could become like yearly flu shots.”

In the meantime warn “experts”that we should be prepared for “flares” every three or four months, even if Covid is endemic.

It seems that “living with the virus” means maintaining the status quo, relaxing a few restrictions but paving the way for new waves of fear porn should the need arise.

But why? Why are they doing this now?

There could be divisions and factions, ruptures in the corridors of power. Maybe some members want of the big club stop the pandemic where it is now, fearing that any further progress towards the “Great Reset” could jeopardize their own position or wealth.


What I think is more likely is that they feel they’ve already overdone themselves and that further expansion could tear their entire story apart.

To use an apt metaphor, think of the Great Reset agenda as an invading army marching through city after city, winning battle after battle, and burning everything in the process.

There comes a point when you have to stop. Your supply lines are strained, your men are tired and weakened, and the occupied citizens are mounting resistance. If you continue now, your entire campaign could fail.

In such a situation, retreat to a defensible position and fasten it. You don’t give back the land you conquered, at least not much of it, but you stop advancing further.

The people whose country you have invaded will be glad the war is over, they will be tired of fighting, they will be relieved to have some respite before they realize how much of their country you have taken from them. They might even say, “Let them keep it as long as they don’t attack us anymore.”

This is how conquest works, since the days of ancient Rome and beyond. A cycle of attacks followed by fortifications.

If we go from ‘pandemic’ to ‘endemic’ we won’t get our rights back, vaccination certificates, surveillance and the culture of paranoia and fear will remain, but people will be so relieved that the fear and propaganda campaign will pause, that they stop fighting.

They won’t fight back, and the “new normal” will literally become just that: normal.

They’ll probably even give the green light to anything Bill Gates wants to do to ensure that “Covid is the last pandemic”.

And then, one day, when people are kind and docile again, a new flavor will come back, or we’ll need a “climate lockdown,” and the urge for control over every aspect of our lives will begin in earnest again.

The best we can do is not fall into this trap.

The press, politicians and big pharma have not all recognized the truth, they are just using some small bits of truth that they have ignored for two years to strengthen their position.

But that doesn’t make it a bad thing.

The very fact that they feel they have to do this shows that resistance is forming and that they are trying to lull us into relaxing.

Now would be the worst time to stop fighting.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.