0 7 min 9 mths

[ad_1]

strategic-culture.org: If there are no prompt responses to Russia’s legitimate security concerns, the next phase will bring with it a more robust military-technical area

It is very clear that the clock is ticking when it comes to how the United States and its NATO allies are responding to Russia’s urgent security proposals.

If the upcoming talks do not lead to firm security guarantees in the near future, Moscow suspects that the US and NATO are using the engagement as a cover for the continuation of long-term military armament against Russia.

Russia’s strategic patience has run out. Years of relentless attacks by the United States and NATO on Russian territory have reached the point where Moscow has unequivocally declared red lines that must be adhered to. In short, no further eastward expansion of the US-led military bloc and, secondly, the withdrawal of US strike weapons from neighboring states.

The most recent phase in the long post Cold War game was Ukraine’s proxy threat. Moscow could be criticized for being too complacent because NATO has not kept its pledges to Russia not to expand eastwards since the late 1990s and has backed off. But the NATO-backed Kiev regime, which threatens the Russian people in eastern Ukraine and the national security of Russia, is the last straw. Better late than never.

The package of security guarantees requested by Russia, released on December 17, led the United States and NATO to agree to hold talks in January.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov has warned that Moscow is not bluffing with its security demands.

Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that a number of technical and military measures will be taken to ensure national security if the US and NATO fail to respond to the demands.

Obviously, Moscow has deliberately set a limited time frame for talks in order to demonstrate tangible progress in adhering to its red lines. Washington and its European allies will have to take legally binding steps to push NATO back. An important test will be whether the United States will agree to Moscow’s request to exclude Ukraine and other former Soviet republics from joining NATO.

The Biden government and NATO have so far ruled out adhering to this Russian demand. It seems unlikely that the US will explicitly state that Ukraine will be denied NATO membership. Washington may continue to delay accession, as it has done since 2008, but it seems too much to ask for an explicit, legally binding promise to deny Ukraine membership of the alliance at some point in the future.

If the United States and its NATO partners have no intention of respecting Russia’s main red line, the question arises as to their intention to start talks.

President Putin has voiced concerns that the talks could be cynically used by the US and NATO as a cover for continuing an aggressive policy towards Russia.

In a conversation with Russian media over the weekend, Putin said: “You [die NATO] will chat endlessly, talk endlessly about the need to negotiate and do nothing but our neighbors [die Ukraine] inflate with modern weapon systems and increase the threat to Russia, with which we will then be forced to somehow deal with it, somehow to live. “

The Kremlin took the most unusual step of posting clean red lines and demanding an immediate response. However, given the historical record of bad faith and duplicity on the part of the US and NATO, it seems a futile hope that there will be a real change of mind. Putin himself seems to admit this in the comments above.

The Biden government is talking about talks with Russia, but all the while Ukraine is being supplied with weapons, military advisers and offensive capabilities. For the rabid anti-Russian regime in Kiev, this means one green light after another to further stir up aggression against Moscow.

Since the CIA-backed coup in Kiev in 2014, Washington has provided Ukraine with over $ 2.5 billion in arms. The Biden administration has earmarked at least another $ 300 million in deadly military assistance for the next year alone. There are plans to divert ammunition destined for Afghanistan. What we are seeing here is a massive mobilization of the war effort by the United States on Russia’s doorstep that has been going on for several years and is gaining momentum. The seemingly belated offer to talk is like a limp hand signal from the driver of a maddening Moloch to stop.

Even more worrying are the efforts of the Pentagon to provide the Ukrainian armed forces with more information about the battlefield. A report in the New York Times last week shows that the US has already passed “usable” intelligence data on Russian troops to the Kiev regime. The Biden administration is now considering stepping up attacks in the name of “defending” Ukraine.

The New York Times report feigned concern by saying: “A potential problem with providing actionable information, American officials admit, is that it could lead Ukraine to do so first [gegen Russland] to strike. “

In reality, this is not a “potential problem” for Washington. It is a conscious calculation. The Pentagon has used the Russophobic Kiev regime that brought it to power as a weapon to destabilize Russia. That had been the strategic goal of imperial planners like the late Zbigniew Brzezinski for decades. And now the “big game” has come to a point where Washington is providing its cat-tyrant regime with information to attack Russian forces within their own borders, that is, to target Russia itself.

This ominous background allows the conclusion that the talks with the US and its NATO partners are in fact nothing more than a nefarious cover for a long-term course of aggression against Russia.

Given the relentless, endemic betrayal by the US and NATO, one suspects that the Russian leadership is well aware that the proposed talks mark a dangerous turning point. If there are no prompt responses to Russia’s legitimate security concerns, the next phase will bring with it a more robust military-technical area. An area that Moscow has apparently already played out, knowing it is almost inevitable.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.