0 11 min 7 mths

[ad_1]

One of the boldest and most sensational political moves by the embattled President of Kazakhstan, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, who made international headlines in recent days, was the arrest of the powerful former head of Kazakhstan’s intelligence service, Karim Massimov, for high treason.

Massimov, who headed the National Security Committee (KNB) until his sudden dismissal and arrest on Thursday, suggests that amid widespread unrest over fuel prices that quickly aimed to overthrow Tokajav’s rule, there is also a power struggle within the government takes place. Massimov had previously been prime minister of the long-time ruler Nursultan Nazarbayev and was long considered his “right hand man”. Shortly thereafter, a photo surfaced that is currently the subject of widespread speculation and shows Joe Biden and Hunter Biden posing with the now incarcerated Kazakh security chief Karim Massimov and the well-connected oligarch Kenes Rachimov.

Also, an email and communications have surfaced that were previously the subject of extensive coverage in the Daily Mail and related to previous in-depth comments and questions about Hunter’s “Laptop From Hell” – which seems to confirm that Hunter Biden and Massimov were “close friends”. At that time it was said: “When Biden was Vice President, Hunter worked from 2012 to 2014 as an agent for Rachichev”. In addition, the emails came from “anti-corruption activists” in Kazakhstan, which revealed that Hunter had been in contact with Rachev. What’s more, “According to the report, Hunter managed to find a $ 1 million investment from Rakishev to a filmmaker with political ties.”

According to an article in the New York Post from 2020, which was written when the photo first caught the attention of Western experts, “follows this Snapshot taken for the first time in 2019 published by a Kazakh anti-corruption website on the bomb-like revelations from the Post of last week detailing Hunter Biden’s overseas business and a report claiming that Rakishev paid the Biden Scion as an intermediary to broker US investments As for power brokers, the NYPost story had given more details:

… Hunter Biden’s alleged collaboration with Rachev by claiming he had regular dinners with the Kazakh businessman and tried to get investments for his money in New York, Washington, DC and a mining company in Nevada.

But Rachichev, who has close ties with Kazakhstan’s kleptocratic ex-president, reportedly ran into trouble when Western business partners realized the obscure origins of his alleged $ 300 million fortune could become a “burden,” the Mail said.

This raises a number of questions, starting with: What are the links between the Biden family and the kleptocratic former president of Kazakhstan and his circle of oligarchs and powerful security officials?

Serious questions arise as the country is still on fire and Russia has dispatched some 3,000 peacekeepers to control the worsening security situation, which appears to be of vital importance to Russia’s interests.

UPDATE: It wasn’t just a meeting. Hunter Biden said Massimov was his “close friend”. This close friend has now been arrested for attempting to overthrow the government of Kazakhstan.

Previously, we presented analysis by attorney and geopolitical commentator Clint Ehrlich, who argued that both last week’s riots and the Hunter Biden connection mean the destabilization of Kazakhstan is a much bigger thing than the western media admit.

Below, Ehrlich analyzes what the Biden connection means in the light of a leaked email and the strange photo that emerged …

URGENT UPDATE on Kazakhstan Crisis: There is explosive news about the attempt at revolution. One of the conspirators was a Kazakh official linked to Joe Biden and Hunter Biden! mThis has a huge impact on geopolitics. Another MEGA thread

Joe and Hunter’s buddy Karim Massimov has met the fate of many Biden business partners … ALMATY, January 8 (Reuters) – The authorities in Kazakhstan have arrested Karim Massimov, the former head of the national security committee.

But we’re going ahead of ourselves. The connection with Biden is just one explosive detail of what is going on in Kazakhstan and what it means to the world. To get a clearer picture, we need to examine Massimov’s role in the country’s power structure in a broader sense.

Nazarbayev ruled Kazakhstan for 28 years, from the collapse of the Soviet Union to his resignation as president in 2019. Before that crisis, many thought he still had control of the country as he retained his position as chairman of the Security Council. When Nazarbayev resigned as president, Massimov likely had ambitions to succeed him. After all, he had been its chief of staff and twice its prime minister.

But there was one big problem: Massimov was only half ethnically Kazakh. Nazarbayev ignored him and instead appointed current President Toyakev as his hand-picked successor. It was therefore a shock when Toyakev removed Nazarbayev from his post as chairman of the Security Council two days ago.

The big question was: did Tokayev take this step at Nazarbayev’s request so that Nazarbayev would not be held responsible when security forces shoot protesters? Or was the impeachment a sign of a rift between Tokayev and Nazarbayev?

The dismissal of Massimov from his position as head of security and his subsequent arrest for high treason add to the mystery. There are two main options.

  • The first is that Massimov against both Tokayev and Nazarbayev went ahead.
  • The second is that Massimov and Nazarbayev together took action against Tokayev – possibly because Nazarbayev feared that the title of “leader of the nation” would be stripped from him.

Many outside commentators have argued that the possibility of a “color revolution” can be ruled out as it appears to be a “palace coup”. This is a serious error, firstly in relation to the content and secondly in relation to the perception.

Set colored revolutions ALWAYS the active participation of a faction of the elite of a country. Recall the famous sound recording by Victoria Nuland, who spoke out about which members of the Ukrainian elite should make up the post-revolutionary government.

Even if no real “colored revolution” has been attempted in Kazakhstan (which is highly questionable), it is in Russia’s interest to spread this narrative. In particular, a foreign attack on Kazakhstan is necessary to make the CSTO-led intervention legal. The fact that the accused “color revolution” leader (or at least one of the main conspirators) is associated with President Biden is therefore a true gift for Russia.

The script writes itself to blame the US, true or false.

Whether the West actually started the crisis quickly becomes irrelevant. The US reaction to the Russian intervention is already putting a strain on bilateral relations and making it difficult to imagine a positive outcome in the upcoming talks to settle the Ukraine conflict.

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken commented on the stationing of 3,000 Russian soldiers in Kazakhstan with the words:

A lesson from recent history is that once they are in your house, it can be very difficult to get rid of Russians.

This remark enraged Russia. The State Department replied:

If Anthony Blinken loves history lessons so much, then it’s important to keep this in mind: When there are Americans in your house, it can be difficult to stay alive and not be robbed or raped.

This is not, to say the least, the tone one would want the world’s two superpowers to adopt on the path to the most important negotiations since the end of the Cold War. A security policy showdown is looming over Ukraine, and our countries are exchanging insults. Many in the western media hoped that the crisis in Kazakhstan would indirectly resolve the situation in Ukraine.

They believed that if Russia intervenes in Kazakhstan, it might not have enough troops to act in Ukraine. These hopes are now quickly dashed. The 3,000 paratroopers and special forces that Russia has dispatched to Kazakhstan appear to have already brought stability to the country.

It was a question of signaling: the Kazakh armed forces will no longer desert knowing that Russia has taken sides. This was largely predictable, since the mere threat of Russian intervention in Belarus was enough to effectively quell the uprising against Lukashenko. The same plan seems to be working in Kazakhstan, albeit in a more aggressive form.

The bottom line is that Russia has more than enough troops to intervene in Ukraine if it so wishes. I do not know how Russia will ultimately decide on this issue. But the situation in Kazakhstan does not make a RU operation any less likely.

On the contrary: as the Kazakhstan crisis has further strained relations between Russia and the West, it is becoming more difficult to find a peaceful solution to the stalemate in Ukraine.

War is more likely now, not less likely.



[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.