0 7 min 9 mths


Unanimous chorus for natural immunological protection
Research by Maccabi Healthcare Services in Tel Aviv
UK Health Security Agenda report
Report to the US Congress by a Johns Hopkins lecturer
Publication of a biologist of the CNR in Italy

from Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio

«Pharma tells us what to do and the CDC gets in line? Have we come to this?“. Starting from these questions last December 14, Dr. Marty Makary accused American public health officials of “modern McCarthyism” and of having published studies not worthy of “a seventh grade scientific experiment”.

The public health researcher and professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health told members of the House Select Committee (US Congress) on the coronavirus crisis that some COVID policies have become “too extreme, too rigid and are no longer guided. from clinical data “.

Makary focused on natural immunity and COVID booster shots for teens. He criticized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) haste to push booster for 16 and 17 year olds based on laboratory experiments which suggest that boosters increase levels of antibodies against Omicron.

Makary assured committee members that he is not “anti-vax” (he was vaccinated for COVID) but accused the CDC of knowingly publishing flawed studies so that people would get the vaccine, rather than waiting to acquire the vaccine. natural immunity by taking and and healing from the virus.

Let’s start with his words this journey through the scientific studies that demonstrate the great effectiveness of natural immunity against Covid-19, ignored by all Western governments to encourage the proliferation of Big Pharma vaccines such as Pfizer, sponsor even of the American attorneys general.

This is now confirmed by the official statements of two experts who we can consider PRO-VAX, because they are absolutely in favor of a vaccination in some sections of the population, but who are equally aware of the effectiveness of natural immunological protection, in many cases – we add – less dangerous than experimental gene sera that can interfere with DNA, as claimed by a geneticist from Cologne, or create phenomena of vaccine-resistance, as asserted by other famous biologists and virologists.


“Many lives are being destroyed” by the government’s failure to recognize natural immunity, Makary said. The lecturer reminded committee members that, despite a combined annual budget of approximately $ 58 billion, neither the CDC nor the National Institutes of Health have produced credible studies on natural COVID immunity, something his research team is stating. undertaking, using private money.

Il professor Marty Makary della Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

The CDC released two studies earlier this year, claiming to show that vaccine immunity outweighs natural immunity. Those studies were so flawed that, according to Makary, they were “worse than a seventh-degree scientific experiment.”

We gave space to this complaint, reported with a lot of video by the American association Children’s Health Defense of the lawyer Robert F. Kennedy jr, because it has a disruptive value. In the first place, Professor Makary cannot be called a fanatic because he works for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health which is not only monitoring all cases of Covid-19 in the world but who even played a fundamental role in organizing there suspected Event 201 exercise of October 2019 in which the scenario of a devastating coronavirus pandemic was in fact heralded.

That event was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum by Great Reset theorist Klaus Schwab, but had as protagonist an important collaborator of Johns Hopkins: the lawyer Avril Haines, expert in biological weapons, former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency during the Obama administration and promoted to US National Intelligence Director by new president Joe Biden.

This observation, repeatedly referred to in the articles on theory of SARS-Cov-2 built in the laboratory in a plot of the New World Order implemented by China and the USA, it is important to understand the reliability of Professor Makary who works for one of the universities that ended up in the whirlpool of suspects of having contributed to creating the terror of the pandemic.


“This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer-lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic illness and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to vaccine-induced immunity to two doses BNT162b2. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and who received a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant. ‘

This is the conclusion reached by the Israeli scientists Sivan Gazit, Roei Shlezinger, Galit Perez, Roni Lotan, Asaf Peretz, Amir Ben-Tov, Dani Cohen, Khitam Muhsen, Gabriel Chodick, Tal Patalon who work for prestigious research centers of Tel. Aviv such as the Kahn Sagol Maccabi (KSM) Research & Innovation Center, Maccabi Healthcare Services and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Tel Aviv University.

Israeli doctor Sivan Gazit, deputy director of the KSM
Research & Innovation Center

The study was approved by the MHS (Maccabi Healthcare Services) Institutional Review Board (IRB) and then published in the specialist medical journal meRxiv last August under the title: “Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity with immunity vaccine induced: reinfection against breccia infections ”.

“We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing three groups: (1) SARS-CoV-2 naïve individuals who received a two-dose regimen of the BioNTech / Pfizer mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine, (2) previously infected individuals who were not vaccinated, and (3) individuals previously infected and vaccinated with a single dose. Three multivariate logistic regression models were applied. In all models we evaluated four outcomes: SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic illness, COVID-19-related hospitalization, and death. The follow-up period from June 1 to August 14, 2021, when the Delta variant was dominant in Israel, “the scientists write in the Abstract.

Israeli research publishes from MedRxiv

«The SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) risk of ‘breach’ infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected when the first event occurred (infection or vaccination) in January and February of 2021 ” the “breach” infection is that which affects the vaccinated despite the immunization process.

«The increased risk was significant (P <0.001) also for symptomatic disease. When infection was allowed to occur at any time prior to vaccination (March 2020 to February 2021), decreased natural immunity was demonstrated, although SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinates had a 5.96 fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk of sudden infection and 7.13-fold increased risk of symptomatic disease (95% CI, 5.51-9.21). SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinates were also at greater risk of COVID-19-related hospitalizations than those who had previously been infected.


UKHSA has previously reported on the number of hospitalizations directly avoided by vaccination. Overall, approximately 261,500 hospitalizations have been prevented in people aged 45 and over up to 19 September 2021. UKHSA and the Cambridge University MRC Biostatistics Unit have previously reported on the direct and indirect impact of the vaccination on infections and mortality. Estimates suggest that 127,500 deaths and 24,144,000 infections were prevented thanks to the COVID-19 vaccination program, up to 24 September “is what the UK Health Security Agency, the UK’s highest authority on health safety, writes in the conclusion of report 42 .

From this report, however, a disconcerting truth emerges which indirectly confirms the complaint of the American professor Makary on the faulty studies in relation to the natural immunity responses to Covid-19.

“None of these models will be updated in the future. This is due to the fact that these models are unable to account for the interventions that would have been implemented in the absence of vaccination. As a result, the status of the real pandemic and the pandemic scenario without vaccination have become less and less comparable over time. For further context around this figure and previous estimates, see previous vaccine surveillance reports. ‘

UK pharmacovigilance reports are disturbing, as we have reported in the past. Not only those who get vaccinated run the risk of even lethal adverse reactions, such as a well-known e young BBC presenter killed by AstraZeneca vaccine, but it hasn’t no certainty of protection from contagion or death from a Covid-19 “breach” infection.


‘The Roche S test that the UK Health Safety Agency (UKHSA) uses for serological surveillance is fully quantitative, which means it measures the level of antibodies in a blood sample; an antibody level above 0.8 AU / mL (approximately one IU / mL using the WHO standard) is considered positive. Surveillance of PHE and UKHSA in recent months has found that over 97% of the blood donor population test positive for S antibodies, which may have been caused by COVID-19 infection or vaccination. With such high seropositivity, it is important to examine the population’s antibody levels to assess the impact of the booster vaccination program ”.

We read on page 24 in the same report 42 released by UKHSA which then goes into detail confirming the effectiveness of natural immunity. (Keep reading…)



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.