0 7 min 12 mths


Scarcely noticed by world public opinion, the first international trial against those responsible and instigators of the ongoing P (l) andemia is being prepared. At the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, a lawsuit has been filed on behalf of British citizens for “crimes against humanity” against high-ranking and well-known elites.

By Emily Mangiaracina

Activists are accusing UK officials and the world’s most powerful health officials of genocide, citing a range of statistics on the effects of “vaccines” and COVID policies.

The group that includes former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) on behalf of British citizens against Boris Johnson and British officials, Bill and Melinda Gates, the executives of Big Pharma, the executive chairman of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab, and others for crimes against humanity.

The UK group, which includes an astrophysicist and a funeral director, has also charged Dr. Anthony Fauci; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World Health Organization (WHO); June Raine, Chief Executive of the Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA); Dr. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; and Dr. Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance, as “responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code… war crimes and crimes of violence. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; and Dr. Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance, as “responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code… war crimes and crimes of aggression” in the UK and other countries.

“To stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, the introduction of illegal vaccination passports and all other types of illegal war … underway against the people of the United Kingdom”.

In the group’s complaint filed on Dec. 6, they present evidence that COVID-19 “vaccines” are actually experimental gene therapies engineered by bat coronavirus gain-of-function, claiming that these “vaccines” have caused deaths and injuries. mass and that the UK government has failed to investigate these reported deaths and injuries;
that the numbers of COVID cases and deaths have been artificially inflated;
that face masks are harmful due to hypoxia, hypercapnia and other causes;
and that the PCR tests are “completely unreliable” and “contain carcinogenic ethylene oxide”.

They also argue that effective treatments for COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, have been suppressed, leading to more COVID-19 deaths than they should have.

They argue that the lockdowns were implemented under the pretext of an artificially inflated infection and death numbers from an engineered virus, as well as experimental “vaccines” led to:

Massive short-term harm and death, with at least 395,049 adverse reactions to COVID “vaccines” reported in the UK alone;

a sharp increase in calls to ChildLine by vulnerable children during lockdown periods; “Destruction of wealth and businesses” through imposed lockdowns;

“” Severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental norms of international law “, including travel and assembly bans, and enforced quarantine and self-isolation; apartheid due to segregation based on possession of a vaccination passport;

and the “expected reduction in fertility” after “vaccination”, among other detrimental physical and psychological effects.

Furthermore, the participants argue that “the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to homicide and requires a full investigation by the court.” They noted that in addition to the censorship of online information and the promotion of these alternative treatments, “some academic journals prevent the publication of studies showing the efficacy of drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

The applicants also cited quotes from Holocaust survivors who drew “strong parallels between Covid restrictions and the onset of the Holocaust.” In an open letter, Holocaust survivors called on medical regulators to “immediately stop this immoral medical experiment on mankind,” which they claim violates the Nuremberg Code.

They also claim that “another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place before our eyes.” One survivor, Vera Sharav, said in an interview cited in the complaint,

“The hard lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever doctors join forces with the government and deviate from their personal, professional and clinical commitment to do no harm to the individual, medicine can be perverted from a healing and humanitarian profession to a killer tool “.

“What distinguishes the Holocaust from all other mass genocides is the central role played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. Every step of the killing process was endorsed by the academic and professional medical establishment. Doctors and prestigious medical societies and institutions lent the semblance of legitimacy to infanticide, to the mass murder of civilians ”.

Indeed, they argue that the destructive consequences of “vaccines”, blockades and the engineered virus are deliberate attempts to depopulate and destabilize society as part of a globally coordinated plan to consolidate wealth and power into the hands of a few.

They argue that these measures therefore also constitute a “crime of aggression”, ie the effort “to effectively exercise control or direct the political or military action of a state”.

In this case, they argue, the goal is to “dismantle all Democratic Nations, step by step”, and to “destroy small and medium-sized enterprises, shifting market shares to the largest corporations”, owned by the ultra -rich, to give this “elite” group greater political and monetary control.

The original source of this article is Lifesite News
Copyright © Emily Mangiaracina, Lifesite News, 2021


SOURCE https://www.globalresearch.ca/big-pharma-gates-fauci-uk-officials-accused-of-crimes-against-humanity-in-complaint-to-international-court/5764970

The whole indictment can be downloaded here.

IMPORTANT !: The material on this site (where there are no particular notices) can be copied and redistributed, provided the source is acknowledged. NoGeoingegneria assumes no responsibility for the articles and republished material.This blog does not represent a newspaper as it is updated without any periodicity. It cannot therefore be considered an editorial product pursuant to law no. 62 of 7.03.2001.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *